The Next 25 Years Begin Now

We welcome you to join us as we build our bold vision for a world without sarcoma cancer.

  • CDMRP Moment of Silence Presenter Miranda Mead
    Miranda Mead

    Sarcoma survivor and Rein in Sarcoma volunteer, Miranda Mead, has served for the past three years as a Peer Reviewer for the United States Department of Cancer Peer Review Panel. Miranda works with leading researchers, scientists, and oncologists from around the country to determine which cancer research proposals they fund.  

    This year, Miranda was asked by Dr. Donna Kimbark, Program Manager for the CDMRP, to serve as the speaker for at the  Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP) meeting on Friday, August 27. Dr. Kimbark has managed research funding programs for autism, multiple sclerosis, cancer, and bone marrow failure syndromes. Miranda opened with a Moment of Silence presentation to remind everyone of the importance of the work and the many lives affected.  

    The CDMRP, created in 1992 via a Congressional appropriation, fosters novel approaches to biomedical research to support the needs of the American public, the military, and Congress. 
     
    The CDMRP funds high impact, high risk and high gain projects that other agencies may not fund. All of the programs managed by the CDMRP share the common goal of advancing research, solutions that will lead to cures or improvements in patient care, or breakthrough technologies and resources. The CDMRP strives to transform healthcare through innovative and impactful research. 

    Thank you, Miranda, for being a part of this team and raising awareness about sarcoma cancers.  

  • PEComa Study

    Rein in Sarcoma has been asked by KJT Group to promote a study they are conducting for people living with PEComa. They are looking for PEComa patients who may be willing to share their experiences. KJT Group will be conducting 60 minute virtual discussions with qualified patients. By sharing feedback with their research team, you can help improve treatment experiences and outcomes of others like you. 

    If you have been diagnosed with PEComa and would be willing to discuss your experiences with KJT, complete the survey. You will be asked a few questions about your background and experience. If you qualify for the study, there will be the opportunity to immediately schedule an interview.

    You may also call 585-582-5068 or email erind@kjtgroup.com.

    Participants will be compensated for their time. 

  • 2021 RIS Research Grant for UMN
    Blake Hastings, RIS Board Director, Melissa Davies, Development Director, Dr. Brenda Wigel (UMN), Eric Lien, RIS Board Vice President, Janelle Calhoun, RIS Executive Director, and Tom Boardman, Development Committee Chair.

    Rein in Sarcoma’s Board approved a research grant to the 2021 University of Minnesota at its January meeting. The number of grants were reduced based on buget decisions made in the spring of 2020. The University solicited requests for funding proposal from their researchers, blindly ranked them according to national standards, and recommended the proposal by Dr. Jaime Modiano, School of Veterinary Medicine to the RIS Research Committee.

    We are pleased to fund this research, and look forward to a presentation on findings at the Sarcoma Research Symposium in 2023. Dr. Modiano has received Rein in Sarcoma research funding in prior grants. He shares with us:

    “The data from our previous Rein in Sarcoma grants has helped us secure almost $6M in external grants for sarcoma research from the federal government (NIH and DOD), the state of Minnesota, and animal health foundations. These grants have been instrumental in helping us to complete work that is reported in numerous peer reviewed scientific articles as well as in lay articles. We are extremely proud of our return on investment from this meritorious program.”

    Dr. Jaime Modiano, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota

    Identifying and Characterizing the Cells that Create the Primary and Metastatic Sarcoma Niche | $50,000

    Jaime Modiano, VMD, PhD

    Jaime Modiano, VMD, PhD – Principle Investigator, Professor of Veterinary Medicine & Research

    Aaron Sarver, PhD – Co-Investigator, UMN Medical School Assistant Professor Institute for Health Informatics

    Sarcomas, or tumors of connective tissues, are challenging to treat because they tend to invade deep into tissues. This behavior makes it virtually impossible to remove all of the cancer even with very aggressive treatments. But some sarcomas pose even greater challenges because they spread to organs far from the primary tumor. In these tumors, the distant spreading, called metastasis, is the eventual cause of death for patients.

    Aaron Sarver, PhD

    Primary tumors of bone (osteosarcomas) and of blood vessels (angiosarcomas) are two highly metastatic sarcomas. The assumption with these cancers is that malignant cells have already spread by the time they are diagnosed. Because of this, patients receive extremely intensive therapies that can have severe side effects. Even so, more than half of patients with bone cancer and with blood vessel cancers die from their disease within about 10 and 3 years, respectively. For bone cancer, a 10-year survival might seem acceptable, were it not for the fact that this cancer mostly affects children, adolescents and young adults. It is well accepted that osteosarcomas and angiosarcomas spread through the blood circulation. This has led many investigators to search for tumor cells in the blood. We pioneered this approach for angiosarcoma almost two decades ago. But recent technological improvements provide opportunities to understand how and why the tumor are able to travel to distant sites. In addition, we are now able to find the chaperones that help them colonize new organs and create homes where they can thrive.

    Osteosarcomas and angiosarcomas are quite rare in people. On the other hand, both are very common in dogs. We have shown that studying these diseases in dogs can help us better understand, diagnose, and potentially manage them in people. Here, we will use the same approach, studying tumor cells in the circulation of dogs with osteosarcoma and angiosarcoma. We will apply a technology called single cell sequencing. We have already developed methods to find and recover these cells from simple blood samples. Our goal is to determine how tumor cells and their chaperones alter their behavior to support the process of metastasis. The information we obtain from this project will support grant applications to the NIH, DOD, and other agencies. This line of work will help us to identify the cells that are responsible for sarcoma metastasis. In turn, the results will guide development of tests for early detection and to monitor disease progression. And finally, our efforts will provide insights to design new, safe and effective therapies to manage or prevent metastasis.

  • RIS Community Member Participates in Scientific Peer Review Panels
    Charlie Gerk with wife and RIS volunteer, Danielle Gerk

    Sarcoma survivor and RIS volunteer Charlie Gerk recently participated in the evaluation of research applications submitted to the Peer Reviewed Cancer Research Program (PRCRP) of the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP).

    Charlie was nominated for participation in the program by Rein in Sarcoma. As a consumer reviewer, he was a full voting member, (along with prominent scientists) at meetings to help determine how the $110 million appropriated by Congress for Fiscal Year 2020 will be spent on cancer research.

    About the PRCRP program

    Consumer reviewers are asked to represent the collective view of patients by preparing comments on the impact of the research on issues such as diagnosis, treatment, and quality of life. When commenting on serving as a consumer reviewer, Charlie said that, “he was heartened to know so many dedicated people are working hard on cures for sarcoma”.

    Consumer advocates and scientists have worked together in this unique partnership to evaluate the merit of research applications since FY09. COL Sarah B. Goldman, Director of the CDMRP, expressed her appreciation for the consumer advocates’ hard work. “Integrating consumer perspectives into our decision-making process brings energy and focus to our research programs. Patients, caregivers, family members, and advocates help us keep our efforts centered around what is truly important to those impacted. We very much value this critical input from our consumers who help ensure that CDMRP’s work remains critical and relevant,” she said.

    Scientists applying propose to support and promote high-impact research for cancer prevention, detection, treatment, quality of life and survivorship, and decreasing the burden of cancer on Service members, their families and the American public. The PRCRP fills important gaps not addressed by other funding agencies by supporting groundbreaking research while encouraging out-of-the-box thinking.

    More information about PRCRP is available at their website: https://cdmrp.army.mil/prcrp/default.


    If you are interested in learning more about participating in the CDMRP’s Scientific Peer Review Panels, please contact Janelle Calhoun, Rein in Sarcoma’s Executive Director at (763) 205-1467 or execdirector@reininsarcoma.org.

  • Profile: Dr. Nancy McAllister
    Dr. Nancy McAllister

    In the three years since she first attended a Rein in Sarcoma event, pediatric oncologist Dr. Nancy McAllister has become deeply engaged in its mission.

    As a Children’s Hospitals and Clinics physician, She is connecting her patients with RIS, welcoming patients at the summer Party and partnering with the Red Flags team to increase awareness throughout the community. We are so excited about this collaboration.

    From the start Dr. McAllister always wanted to be a pediatric oncologist. She took a slight detour, however, after completing her pediatric residency. Her husband had a medical job in Idaho through his military commitment, and Nancy began practicing as a regular pediatric physician. For a time, she thought the plan for their life might have shifted. She and her husband could have a family and raise their children, while she worked a manageable schedule as a pediatric doctor.

    Then one day, she looked at her husband and said, “This is not why I went to medical school.” Her passion for pediatric oncology was still strong. Fortunately, her husband supported this return to her original vision. She took her Fellowship in Pediatric Hematology and Oncology in Utah and was fortunate to study under a great mentor, Karen Albritton. Dr. McAllister gravitated to Dr. Albritton because of their personal connection and Dr. Albritton’s excellence, and also because of Nancy’s affinity for Dr. Albritton’s patients. Dr. Albritton was focused on treating sarcoma, so Nancy too began to develop this specialty.

    After Dr. Albritton left Utah, Dr. McAllister led the sarcoma team there for two years. Then a colleague of hers traveled to Minnesota to interview for an open job at Children’s Hospitals of Minnesota. He returned and said to Nancy: “Well, I found your dream job.”

    Patients First

    Although she had not been looking for a change and could have stayed happily in Utah with her fine team there, Dr. McAllister did go to Minnesota to interview for the Children’s job. She “fell in love” with the opportunity and her husband was happy to move back with her, where they would be closer to their family roots.

    What did Dr. McAllister like so much? “The ability to focus on managing patients, first.” Although research and other interests could be pursued if desired, “first and foremost, you get to develop programs and figure out how to manage patients well.” What Dr. McAllister had always wanted to focus on was treating patients. This opportunity offered a great chance to do that, in an outstanding setting.

    Since 2006 Dr. McAllister has worked at Children’s, where she serves as a medical oncologist treating pediatric patients with sarcoma. She also focuses on children who have head and neck cancers.

    For her sarcoma patients, Dr. McAllister collaborates with the University of Minnesota. Dr. Denis Clohisy and his team perform all the surgeries, since they have so much talent and experience. She works with him to develop the treatment plan for gaining local control, then each does their part. The biggest barrier to their collaboration? A better system for allowing the surgical team to review images and scans taken through Children’s would be great!

    Joining the RIS Mission

    I was privileged to invite Nancy into the RIS community about three years ago. My neighbor, pediatric oncologist Dr. Joanna Perkins, had been a vital resource for me as I worked to understand my own treatment options for sarcoma in 2007. Once I learned how wonderful RIS was, I shared the Wyckoffs’ interest in deepening our collaboration with Children’s and their patients. So I asked Joanna about this possibility, and she referred me to Nancy

    From the start, Dr. McAllister was an engaged participant. In 2009, she and her colleague Dr. Julie Chu attended the Party to celebrate along with survivors. By the 2011 Party, Drs. McAllister and Chu were serving patients and families at the picnic. For 2012, the Children’s contingent will include Drs. McAllister and Chu along with nurse practioners Missy Christensen and Lori Ranney and nurse Cindy Sawtell all of whom work with sarcoma patients.

    Their involvement is not limited to the Party. When she was asked to become part of the Red Flags initiative, Dr. McAllister was “excited and enthusiastic to be part of that.” She cares about improving education and awareness, because she thinks “this could save lives.” She and Dr. Chu are collaborating with Theresa Baultrippe, Sue Wyckoff, and several other physicians from the University of Minnesota and elsewhere to develop materials for use with both professionals and lay people.

    Children’s has a great outreach program already established through many Minnesota locations outside the Twin Cities metro area. Dr. McAllister would like to bring the sarcoma message out, using this network. Dr. McAllister also appreciated the chance to take part in the recent RIS Stakeholders’ Dialogue meeting, led by Lisa Griebel. “What was amazing to me about that event,” she said, is that a huge group of people came together for a few hours and shared many ideas “in a meaningful way,” and this will translate into a tangible and strategic plan. She has found her time with RIS teams to be well spent. She also found it “so great to have the historical perspective, through the timeline,” for where the group has been.

    A Future Dream

    Dr. McAllister finds it “such an honor and a privilege to walk through this very difficult time” with children and families facing cancer. She is able to establish deep relationships with people “who are so vulnerable, so needing.” Thankfully, the outcome often can be health and life.

    Over time, outcomes are improving for more people. And there is hope for even more improvement, especially since one “beauty of the pediatrics world” is that there is a well-established process for conducting clinical trials that will help develop better treatments. In the meantime, as doctors advance the science, national teams design uniform treatment strategies that use the best science available now. This allows children to receive the best possible care, no matter where they live.

    Dr. McAllister seriously hopes the day comes, in a decade or two, when doctors will look back at current practices and say, “I can’t believe we did that.” She hopes there are advances, for example, in better utilizing the body’s immune system to treat itself, or in targeting specific molecular or genetic changes. Certain sarcomas “cry out” for targeted therapies, like Ewing’s sarcoma and synovial sarcoma, given what we know about the tumors.

    That first day, driving to the Party, Nancy McAllister and Julie Chu weren’t really sure what kind of an event they would be attending, or what kind of group this was. We are so happy that they found the group meaningful, and have been willing to make such meaningful contributions of their own. Here’s to our continued mission!

    By Christin Garcia

  • Profile: Dr. Jaime Modiano
    Dr. Jaime Modiano

    University of Minnesota Professor Jaime Modiano is a dog doctor, whose passion for treating his animal patients may translate into new medicine for you. Dogs get sarcoma cancers, naturally, at a much higher rate than people do. They also have much shorter life spans than people. We can learn a lot by studying dogs, and can quickly determine which new treatments may be best, for them and for us. University scientists, medical doctors and veterinary doctors are working together on many exciting research projects, including those for angiosarcoma and osteosarcoma. Dr. Modiano says: “I’m doing something I love to do,” which may end up helping people and their pets. To learn more about exciting sarcoma collaborations, some inspired and funded by RIS, keep reading!

    Dr. Modiano completed his training in veterinary medicine and received a PhD in immunology at the University of Pennsylvania in 1991. He completed a residency and fellowship in Colorado, then moved to Texas A&M for several years. From 1999 to 2007 he worked in Colorado, serving as a senior scientist in cancer research and an Associate Professor of Immunology. Dr. Modiano misses the gorgeous mountains and dry air in Colorado, but also loves his new work in Minnesota. In 2007 he joined the College of Veterinary Medicine here, where he serves as Professor of Comparative Oncology and as Director of the Animal Cancer Center and Research Program.

    “I am a dog doctor, I am proud to be a dog doctor.”

    Dr. Jaime Modiano

    Dr. Modiano began our interview by emphasizing that “I am a dog doctor, I am proud to be a dog doctor.” He studies naturally occurring cancers that arise spontaneously in dogs. Dogs are much less likely than people to get breast cancer or prostate cancer. “Dogs don’t smoke,” and they don’t really get lung cancers. Their diets are a bit different, so they don’t get a lot of the gut cancers humans do. Dogs do get cancer, though, and the cancers they are much more likely to get are blood cancers and sarcomas. These cancers are “very rare in people, and very common in dogs.” This gives doctors an opportunity and a question: “Can we use the tumors happening spontaneously in dogs to help us answer the questions” why people get cancer, and what doctors can do about it?

    In many respects, the answer is a resounding YES. For example, other than the life stage at which it occurs, osteosarcoma in dogs is “virtually identical” to the disease in people. And in dogs, it may be much easier to figure out what is driving the problem. There are many steps on the way to a cancerous tumor. First, one cell needs to “become bad.” Then this cell needs to acquire the ability to outcompete its neighbors and grow out of control. Many different things can go wrong along the way, and when scientists look at many tumors – even of the same cancer type – they see hundreds of different genetic mutations. What they really need to know is: Which are the really bad actors? What should be our targets? Because people have exercised control over dog breeding, there are discrete breeds with more isolated, narrower gene pools. This gives doctors a better chance to find important traits that really drive cancer growth and spread.

    Some time ago, Dr. Modiano and his colleagues began approaching this question in a slightly different way: they decided to “let the tumor tell us what matters.” They identified molecular genetic “signatures” that tended to appear in one of two different ways in each bone tumor. When they looked at the two groups of animals to see if there were any other differences between them, besides the genetic signature of their tumor, they discovered that these signatures correlated with survival time. One signature occurred in a group that did very poorly; the other signature occurred in a group that did better. The team then applied their bone cancer signature test to other groups of dogs or people and found that separation into two similar groups was there, every time.

    Jaime is married to Dr. Michelle Ritt, a board certified specialist and Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. They share their home with Logan and Quetzal. The researchers think they know what cellular component is responsible for causing the really bad outcome, but more testing is needed. With this year’s RIS grant, Dr. Modiano will test to see if different variations of the gene he thinks is so important really will cause differences between the two bone cancer signatures. If the answer is yes, “then we have a target” for new drug treatments.

    With an earlier RIS grant, Dr. Modiano studied angiosarcoma growth and development. He was able to build upon previous work to strengthen the evidence for “very select survival-related effects” associated with certain cancer stem cells. In other words, scientists may be able to predict which tumors will develop rapidly and spread aggressively by looking to see whether or not they have these few certain kinds of cells. Figuring out how these particularly lethal cancer cells stay alive, even when they should be marked for death by our body, also may give doctors new drug targets.

    For both projects, small RIS grants have allowed Dr. Modiano to build upon past research and strengthen the evidence for major grant requests, which ultimately may leverage scientific experiments into better clinical knowledge and successful cancer treatment, for our dogs and for their people. And once again, we see collaborative energy stirring at the University, leading scientists with different backgrounds and specialties to work together in asking important questions and pursuing creative answers. For this support, Dr. Modiano is “very excited and very grateful.” For the work, we are excited and grateful as well.

    By Christin Garcia

    To learn about the Modiano Lab at the University of Minnesota, click here.